- Scientific Misconduct and Medical Journals | Medical Journals and Publishing | JAMA | JAMA Network
- Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research
In essence, GCP can be viewed as a system of shared responsibilities between sponsors, clinical investigators, Institutional Review Boards, and the Food and Drug Administration FDA , all working together to preserve the integrity of clinical research. When questionable accuracy or fraud infects a trial, the affects become contagious. Study site standard operating procedure, Clinical Trial Magnifier, Vol.
Rees M, Wells F. Falling research in the NHS. BMJ , , c Adv Physiol Educ , 29, The effect of scientific misconduct on the results of clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials , 26, Reynolds SM: ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research Clin Trials , 1, JAMA , , Manheimer E, Anderson D: Survey of public information about ongoing clinical trials funded by industry: evaluation of completeness and accessibility.
Accountability and Responsibility in Research. Patricia K. Woolf - - Journal of Business Ethics 10 8 - Responsible Conduct of Research. Adil E. Shamoo - - Oxford University Press.
Scientific Misconduct and Medical Journals | Medical Journals and Publishing | JAMA | JAMA Network
Fraud in Science an Economic Approach. James R. Wible - - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22 1 Defining and Understanding Fraud. Rossouw - - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 4 Vos - - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 2 Lynoe , L.
Lundgren - - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 6 Downloads Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart. Sign in to use this feature.
- Sign up for the free weekly Nature Index newsletter?
- Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research, 4th edition.
- Slavic Prosody: Language Change and Phonological Theory.
- A Right to Die (Nero Wolfe, Book 40).
- Ethical Dimensions of the Foreign Policy of the European Union : a Legal Appraisal.
This article has no associated abstract. Medical Research Ethics in Applied Ethics categorize this paper.
It was then we found their name in the newspapers, on Retraction Watch , and in a few other places. According to the reports, this person had falsified data, and published it, on a number of occasions over several years — both as postdoc and as principal investigator.
An inquiry at their home university had upheld allegations of misconduct, and they had been fired from their post. And this brings me back to where we came in, to the effect scientific malpractice has on other people.
Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research
The scientific fraudster who worked briefly for us had lied and cheated their way to a prestigious position, winning grants and awards on the back of made-up research. Through winning research funds and positions — deceitfully — they denied an incredible opportunity to somebody who might have actually deserved it; they prevented some other young, honest and hard-working scientist from fulfilling their potential.
There is a spectrum of wrongdoing in science, from selecting the one result out of many that makes sense to you, up to deliberately faking figures in papers. Topics Science Occam's corner. Reuse this content. Order by newest oldest recommendations. Show 25 25 50 All.